College Kids Give Their Top Picks For Socially Responsible Brands
The green lifestyle may have been spearheaded by the boomers
of America (think Al Gore), but it's the next generation (think college kids
or those ranging in age from 18-30) that are making eco-friendly living a priority and
using their cash to support their beliefs. A recent survey by New York-based
Alloy Media & Marketing found that 41 percent of students intend to spend
their money only with "socially responsible" brands.
First, let's be clear about what the term "socially
responsible" means. It's an often used buzz word that typically trails
behind terms such as eco-friendly, green living, etc. For the purposes of the
above survey, socially responsible companies employed the following tactics:
-Regularly/consistently donate money to a charity/cause. -Use eco-friendly business practices. -Fair labor practices. -Social messages incorporated into advertising (Nike is sooo
good at this). -Supporting diversity in the workplace.
Yep, that sounds about right. But, I would also add that a
company's core values and mission statement would be slanted in a more socially
responsible way. Companies that typically fall into the "socially
responsible" category often make sure that their corporate culture is
aligned with living responsibly both professionally and as a corporate entity.
This focus trickles down to employees and then, customers. It's a rather
fabulous way to do business, don't you think?
In Alloy's survey, students went on to identify their top
picks for socially responsible retailers. Check out their choices below:
-Nike: Shoes & Apparel -Toyota: Automotive -Yoplait: Food & Beverage (this one took me by surprise,
but the company does donate 10 cents to the Susan G. Komen Foundation for every
returned yogurt lid...) -Target: General Retail -Burt's Bees: Personal Care
Nike and Burt's Bees are a given--their products and company
culture embody social responsibility. Who would you
nominate as a socially responsible general retailer? Food and beverage
company? Leave your nominations here!
--Heather Strang
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca6a453ef00e554d8a86b8833
I'm going to have to go with IKEA... especially in light of their decision to "bag the plastic bag" in their US locations. As a huge company their footprint will be huge, but they minimize where they can.
I would have to say Patagonia beats all of the above. They only produce jackets and other clothing in a certain umber of colors because dyes are so harmful. They have been pursuing these practices for years...way before it became vogue to do so.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
I'm going to have to go with IKEA... especially in light of their decision to "bag the plastic bag" in their US locations. As a huge company their footprint will be huge, but they minimize where they can.
Posted by: Brooke Nelson | October 03, 2008 at 07:46 PM
I would have to say Patagonia beats all of the above. They only produce jackets and other clothing in a certain umber of colors because dyes are so harmful. They have been pursuing these practices for years...way before it became vogue to do so.
Posted by: Matt Whitmire | September 10, 2008 at 12:56 PM